State may consider revising ‘right to correct’ for nursing homes

State lawmakers this past interim discussed ways to enhance the quality of long-term care facilities in the state, including whether to limit “right-to-correct” laws that allow providers to avoid state penalties by addressing certain violations within a specified time. Legislation that would have restricted providers’ right to correct violations was considered but not enacted in 2015 by the 84th Legislature. Similar proposals could emerge this legislative session.

The Senate Committee on Health and Human Services,  at a hearing last February, considered how to improve quality and oversight in long-term care settings. Its interim report, released in November, recommends several changes, including removing the right to correct for violations that result in actual harm to clients. Limiting right-to-correct provisions by repealing them from statute and revising them in rule was also among the recommendations from the Sunset Advisory Commission in its 2014-15 review of the Department of Aging and Disability Services (DADS). Sunset’s recommendation followed its finding that few long-term care providers in Texas face enforcement actions for health and safety violations.

DADS in fiscal 2016 assessed 51 administrative penalties against nursing homes, which committed 18,089 violations during that time, according to the agency. A single administrative penalty may be assessed for multiple violations. Also in fiscal 2016, nursing homes had 14,751 federal deficiencies and faced 261 federal civil money penalties. A single violation cannot result in more than one monetary penalty, meaning a facility cannot receive both a state administrative penalty and a federal civil money penalty for the same violation.

Current law

Provisions giving long-term care providers the right to correct appear in the Texas Health and Safety Code and the Human Resources Code. For example, Health and Safety Code, sec. 242.0665 prohibits DADS from collecting an administrative penalty against a nursing home or related institution if the facility corrects a violation within 45 days of receiving notice.

The right to correct does not apply to certain violations, including those that result in serious harm to or death of a resident, constitute a serious threat to the health or safety of a resident, or substantially limit the institution’s capacity to provide care. If an institution fails to maintain a correction for at least a year, DADS may assess an administrative penalty equal to three times the amount of the penalty assessed, but not collected, for the initial violation.

Recent legislation

SB 204 by Hinojosa, which the 84th Legislature considered in 2015 but did not enact, would have removed from statute right-to-correct provisions for nursing homes and other long-term care providers. It would have required the executive commissioner of the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) to define in rule the types of minor violations a facility could correct before the assessment of an administrative penalty. The commissioner would have had to ensure that all other types of violations were not subject to a right to correct. The bill was passed by both chambers but died in conference committee.

Debate about right to correct

The Legislature in 2017 may consider proposals similar to SB 204 that would repeal right-to-correct provisions from statute and require that they be revised in rule to specify which minor violations could be corrected.

Supporters of restricting long-term care providers’ right to correct violations say these provisions are a key reason that few circumstances allow the state to assess a penalty against long-term care facilities. The average overall rating of Texas nursing homes that accept Medicaid and Medicare is 57 out of 100, according to DADS’ Quality Reporting System, and supporters say the state needs better tools to discourage inadequate care. While the right to correct makes sense for low-level violations, they say, it should not be allowed when residents were harmed or for repeated violations, which is sometimes the case under the current system. Supporters also say there is little evidence that Texas nursing homes are overregulated compared to those in other states, as suggested by some opponents, and that more effort, rather than more money, could make better progress toward improving long-term care.

Opponents of restricting long-term care providers’ right to correct violations say the change is unnecessary because the nursing home industry already is highly regulated. The current right-to-correct system works well, they say, particularly because the fine triples if a facility fails to keep a violation corrected for a year, and long-term care providers can face substantial federal penalties for health and safety violations. Opponents also say inconsistencies in surveys of regulatory compliance across different regions of the state must be addressed to ensure violations are being assessed fairly. They say the survey system should be more focused on improvement than on punishment. Many factors other than safety regulations contribute to quality long-term care, they say, including higher Medicaid reimbursement rates. Opponents also say limiting providers’ right to correct violations at this time would coincide inappropriately with substantial changes taking place on the federal level to long-term care regulations.

For more on nursing home regulation, see earlier Interim News Briefs post, Nursing home enforcement may be considered.

by Mary Beth Schaefer

Posted in Human Services, Regulation and Licensing | Tagged , , , ,

TEA seeks funds to boost school internet connectivity

The Texas Education Agency (TEA) is asking the Legislature to spend $25 million in fiscal 2018 to help school districts qualify for a federal program that discounts optical fiber construction projects. The agency said the $25 million state investment ultimately could leverage an estimated $250 million in federal funds for projects to improve internet connectivity and speed in Texas classrooms.

TEA included the one-year funding as a desired “exceptional item” above its proposed baseline budget in its fiscal 2018-19 legislative appropriations request. The 85th Legislature will begin considering state agency budget requests soon after it convenes in January 2017. Continue reading

Posted in Public Education, State Budget | Tagged , , ,

Texas state parks planning updates with dedicated funding

Over the next few years, the state park system in Texas will undergo several repairs and renovations made possible by newly dedicated funding. According to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD), legislation enacted by the 84th Legislature in 2015 to dedicate funding for parks will allow the department to address longstanding maintenance issues, as well as make repairs needed after recent extreme weather.

Continue reading

Posted in Natural Resources, State Budget | Tagged , , ,

Texas may consider raising age of adult criminal responsibility

Texas is one of seven states in which 17-year-olds accused of committing crimes automatically enter the adult criminal justice system, rather than the juvenile system. The age at which young offenders enter the adult system is referred to as the age of adult criminal responsibility. Legislation to raise the age of adult criminal responsibility to 18 years old in Texas failed in the 2015 legislative session but could emerge again in 2017 during the regular session of the 85th Legislature.

Continue reading

Posted in Criminal Justice | Tagged , ,

State considers fixes to school finance

Following a Texas Supreme Court ruling in May that upheld the constitutionality of the school finance system, lawmakers are examining several ways to revise the funding structure, which the court called an “ossified regime ill-suited for 21st century Texas.”

The House committees on appropriations and public education held joint hearings in late September on interim charges related to the finance system, including “hold harmless” funding, facilities funding, and recapture.

Continue reading

Posted in Public Education, Taxation | Tagged , , ,